IRB Information for Investigators

Information about writing and submitting a research application to the IRB, as well as information about post-approval monitoring of IRB-approved research. 

Required Education for Investigators

All individuals engaged in human subjects research at the Carilion Clinic must take the Carilion-specific CITI Training human participant protections training before their research can be approved by the IRB. 

CITI User Guide

Each CITI curriculum consists of a series of required modules and each module has a short quiz. You must pass each quiz with a minimum score of 80%. A running tally is compiled in the grade book. If you want to improve a score, you may repeat any quiz in which you did not score 100% correct by selecting the View This Module Again tab.

Investigator and Key Study Personnel Guidance

Biomedical Researchers

This is required for all Investigators (i.e., Primary Investigators and co-investigators) who are responsible for the project as a whole and all project staff who have direct contact with human participants (e.g., for subject recruitment and data collection) or who have access to information that links participants’ names with their data. This is an entry-level course suitable for investigators and staff conducting biomedical research with human subjects.

A Basic course must always be taken before a Refresher course can be accepted. If you do not have a record of previous course completion or HRPO staff cannot find records via CITI, you will not receive previous credit.

Three years after the completion of the Basic course, investigators and staff must take the Refresher 1 module in order to participate in new studies. After six years, investigators and staff must take the Refresher 2 module in order to participate in new studies.

Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

This course, in addition to the Human Subject Research Biomedical Investigators course, is required for all research team members who are responsible for the conduct, management and oversight of NIH-funded applicable clinical trials or FDA-regulated research (research involving drugs, devices or biologics, whether FDA approved or experimental).

GCP training must be refreshed at least every three years to remain current with regulations, standards and guidelines.

Conflict of Interest Mini-Course

This must be completed by researchers and staff who conduct research with external funding or support.

The mini-course must be taken once every four years.                     

Note: The Social Behavioral Human Subjects Course has been removed and is no longer an option. You may add supplemental courses that are applicable to your research to the Biomedical Researchers course.

All required modules must be completed in order to receive credit for the training course. Upon completion of a required module, it is your responsibility to print or download a Course Completion Report as evidence that you have met the IRB training and education requirement. The IRB may request a copy of your completion report with your IRB submission. Email irb@carilionclinic.org if you have any questions. 

Access CITI Training

Categories of Review

How is research defined by the federal regulations?

The Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, that leads to generalizable knowledge.

A human subject is a living individual from whom an investigator obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the individual and uses, studies or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or obtains, uses, studies, analyzes or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens. 

Determining level of review

The IRB assigns each application to an appropriate level of review:

  • Not Human Subjects Research
  • Quality Improvement/Quality Assurance
  • Exempt
  • Expedited
  • Full Board

How does the IRB determine the level of review for my application? 

The guidance linked below describes how the Carilion Clinic IRB differentiates human subjects research from non-human subjects research, and the level of review needed for each proposal. 

Determining Level of Review

How do I know if my proposal is human subjects research or not human subjects research? 

The guidance linked below will help investigators determine whether a project is human subjects research, not human subjects research or a quality assurance/quality improvement project. The guidance also includes considerations for case reports. 

Not Human Subjects Research, QA/QI Submissions, Case Reports

What type of research is considered exempt? 

Research that may qualify under this category generally involves education, behavioral or social science studies that present little or no risk to the study subjects. 

Click/tap the link below for more guidance and additional types of research that may qualify for exempt review. 

Exempt Review

What type of research may qualify for expedited review? 

Research activities that present no more than minimal risk to human subjects and involve only procedures that are outlined in the link below. Please note that exempt categories do not permit FDA-regulated studies. 

Expedited Review

When will my proposal need to be reviewed by the full board? 

Full board review of research is conducted when the research does not meet the criteria for exemption of review or expedited review or otherwise determined to necessitate review at a convened meeting of an IRB committee. Click/tap below for guidance on full board review. 

Full Board Review

IRB Application Templates

PRIS3M Application Templates

IRB Application templates with branching options are provided as examples only. Submissions to the Carilion Clinic IRB are required to be submitted in PRIS3M submission system. Please contact our office at irb@carilionclinic.org with any questions.

New Submissions

How To Submit a Study to the IRB

All new submissions must come through the PRIS3M online submission system. To access the PRIS3M system for the first time, sign in with your Carilion Clinic Active Directory user name and password and an account will be created for you. If you do not have an active directory user name and password, please contact the Primary Investigator for the study and/or the Department Chair. 

Before getting started, view the video Signing Into the PRIS3M System linked below.

Click the PRIS3M Submission System button below for access to the online submission system.

What types of applications are supported in the PRIS3M system?

The PRIS3M application supports multiple types of research applications, including: 

  • Human Subjects Research Study
  • Determination of Human Subjects Research 
    • Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement
    • Case Reports
    • Use of De-Identified Data
  • Establishing a Prospective Data or Specimens Research Repository
  • Humanitarian Use Device (non-research use)
  • Expanded Access or Compassionate Use
  • Single Patient Emergency Use
  • Preparatory to Research Application
  • IRB Grant Review (only for preliminary approval if required by funder)
  • Requesting Carilion Clinic Rely on Another IRB of Record (WCG IRB, NCI IRB, VT, UVA, Advarra, etc.)

How do I know where my study is in the PRIS3M system?

Study Status in PRIS3M outlines the status of studies in the PRIS3M system to assist investigators in understanding the way that studies progress through the system. 

Training Video

This training video shows you how to navigate a stipulation request to a change/update form.

How to Respond to a Submission Correction (Stipulation)

Changes and Updates

We need to make some changes to our approved study. What do we need to know?

Changes that need to take place in a research study must be approved by the IRB before those changes may be implemented. The link below outlines guidance on the process for notifying the IRB about any changes or updates to  approved research projects. 

Examples of changes that need to be submitted to the IRB before implementation include:

  • Study procedures
  • Consent document/process
  • Study documents
  • Changes in personnel
  • Inclusion of additional participants
  • Increase in length of study
  • Identification of new risks
  • Closure to accrual of new subjects (analysis of identifiable data ongoing)

Additional examples and guidance can be found through the link below

How to Notify IRB of Changes/Updates to Research Projects

User Guide: How to Submit a Post-Approval Change/Update Submission in PRIS3M

Continuing Review/Annual Check In

Continuing Review

Federal regulations mandate that a research protocol must be reviewed by the IRB at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than at least once every 12 months for the duration of the study.  Continuing review must be substantive and meaningful, and it must address any new information or changes that relate to risk/discomfort, benefits, safeguards for participants, and informed consent to assure that all criteria for approval specified under 45 CFR 46.111 and/or 21 CFR 56.111 are satisfied. 

Expedited studies that are FDA regulated require a continuing review as well as studies that were approved before the 2018 Common Rule Change. The IRB may require a continuing review for any expedited study at its discretion. 

Annual Check-In

The IRB may determine that an Annual Check-in review process is appropriate for studies that are approved according to expedited criteria and that do not require a full continuing review. These studies are minimal risk and not FDA regulated. 

The link below provides guidance for the continuing review and study check-in process. 

Continuing Review and Check In

User Guide: Submitting a Continuing Review, Annual Check-in, PRI or a Conclusion Form in PRIS3M

PRIS3M Submission System

Promptly Reportable Information

What is an adverse event and when do I need to report it to the IRB? 

It is important to be aware that certain events must be reported to the IRB within a specific time frame. The link below clarifies when unanticipated problems, including adverse events, must be reported to the Carilion Institutional Review Board (IRB), and  outlines the process for reporting them. 

Adverse Event Reporting

What constitutes non-compliance? 

Below you will find guidance outlining procedures for handling non-compliance with regard to research activities. 

Conduct of Research: Non-Compliance, Suspension, Termination, Unanticipated Problem

What should occur when a complaint is received?

Below you will find guidance outlining procedures for handling complaints from a participant or any other source.

Procedure for Complaints regarding Human Subjects Research

What is research misconduct and how is it addressed by the IRB? 

Research misconduct is defined as the fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in proposing, performing or even reviewing research, or in reporting research results. The link below further delimits what constitutes research misconduct. 

Research Misconduct

User Guide: Submitting a Continuing Review, Annual Check-in, PRI or a Conclusion Form in PRIS3M

Study Completion: Ending IRB Oversight

What do I need to do when I want to close a study? 

IRB oversight must continue through the data analysis phase if data analysis includes identifiable data. When all study conduct is concluded, including the review of identifiable data, the investigator must submit a conclusion form through the PRIS3M system. The link below offers additional guidance for study conclusion.  

Study Conclusion and the End of IRB Oversight

I concluded a study, but now I need to re-open it. What should I do? 

Once a study has been concluded, no further activity may take place. There are occasions when a study team will request to re-open a study. The linked guidance provides information for the process of re-opening a closed study. 

Re-Opening a Study After Conclusion

User Guide: Submitting a Continuing Review, Annual Check-in, PRI or a Conclusion Form in PRIS3M

PRIS3M Submission System

Relying on External IRBs and Collaborations

About Carilion Clinic IRB Reliance Agreements

An IRB reliance agreement is a formalized agreement that allows an institution engaged in non-exempt human research to entrust IRB review and approval to an external IRB. Detailed information about this process can be found at the link below. 

What is a Reliance Agreement?

What do I need to know about IRB Reliance Agreements for multi-site research?

A reliance agreement allows one IRB (IRB of Record) to review research for multiple sites, reducing duplicate oversight. Several factors determine what IRB will serve as the IRB of Record. Click on link below for overview:

Single IRB Review Reliance Agreement Overview

The link below outlines the process to request the Carilion IRB to rely on an external IRB using an established Master Agreement. 

Requesting Carilion IRB to Rely on an External IRB: Established Master Agreements Only

What do I need to do if I want to collaborate on a multi-center, industry-sponsored study using the commercial IRBs Advarra or WCG? 

The link below describes the process of interaction between the Carilion Clinic IRB and the Advarra or WCG IRB. 

Commercial IRBs

What are Carilion Clinic's IRB review fees for industry/commercially-supported research studies when Carilion is relying on the other IRB? 

All new studies with industry/commercial sponsors with contracts being negotiated on or after June 1, 2023 will include the Carilion IRB fee of $500 for a local-context administrative review.

Administrative review where Carilion is the relying IRB will include the Carilion IRB fee of $500.

What do I need to do if I want to open an adult or pediatric cooperative group oncology trial approved by the National Cancer Institute Central IRB (NCI CIRB)? 

The link below offers guidance for the process of interaction between the Carilion Clinic IRB and the NCI CIRB.

NCI Studies

I think my research study will need to be reviewed by the Carilion IRB and the IRB of another institution. What do I need to know? 

In some cases research protocols may require the review of the Carilion Clinic IRB and the IRB of another institution. In all of these instances, a written memorandum of understanding that is executed between the Carilion IRB and the IRB of the outside institution will offer clarity to the IRB oversight process. Click/tap below to learn more about reciprocal IRB review and reliance agreements. 

Reciprocal IRB Review (Reliance Agreements)

Reporting Requirements for Request to Rely Studies

When to consult with the Carilion IRB

Vulnerable Populations

Who are considered to be especially vulnerable in a research setting, and what do I need to know to include these individuals in research? 

Certain groups of human subjects are considered to be particularly vulnerable in a research setting. The guidance linked below defines vulnerable populations and notes additional approval criteria and safeguards that must be met prior to IRB approval of research involving vulnerable individuals. 

Vulnerable Populations

Drugs, Devices and Biologics

Emergency and Treatment Use of Investigational Drug or Biologic

When can an investigational medical device be used and when should this be communicated to the IRB? 

The guidance below outlines the IRB process for review and approval of investigational medical devices, including emergency and compassionate use, as well as humanitarian use devices. 

Investigational Device Exemption, Significant/Non-Significant Risk Devices, Humanitarian Use Devices, Emergency Use and Compassionate Use

Can I use an investigational drug or biologic for emergency or treatment? 

The link below outlines guidance for IRB review and approval of research involving the emergency and treatment use of investigational drugs. When reviewing the guidance, make note of the required time periods for communicating with and reporting to the IRB. 

Emergency and Treatment Use of an Investigational Drug

 

Genetic Testing Guidance

What do I need to know about collecting and analyzing human biological samples?

Research involving human biological samples requires careful consideration for DNA, RNA and protein analysis. Study submissions must detail sample collection methods, storage procedures and analytical techniques while protecting participant rights.

See detailed guidance below for specific requirements on sample handing, analysis methods and participant protections.

IRB Submission Guideline Human Sample Genetic Testing

Post-Approval Monitoring

The HRPO offers several post approval monitoring programs. 

Research Education Sessions (RESs)

RESs are conducted for internal quality review of studies and are intended to be a collaborative review process. RESs allow us to address any questions from or needs of the research team. This process also provides an opportunity to identify any issues that may become challenges as the study progresses. Our goal is to work together to problem solve and develop solutions as early as possible.

Direct or For-Cause Reviews

These are conducted at the request of the IRB, the IRB chair, the HRPO director, the Institutional Official or their designee. 

Voluntary Reviews

These are conducted on request of the Principal Investigator (PI) to support self-assessment and improvement efforts by the PI and/or study team. 

Human Research Protections Program Quality Assurance

These reviews are conducted periodically to track and improve overall satisfaction and institutional compliance with human research protections program requirements.

Additional Information

Post Approval Monitoring